LOL...really my ninja? Really? Dude was just lounging. I need to get me one of these apps for real.

Login to view embedded media

ICYMI, Dave Portnoy of Barstool Sports publicly called NCAA Champion Angel Reese a "classless POS" over the weekend.
Gillie & Wallo of the Million Dollars Worth Of Game show (they are under the Barstool corporate umbrella) replied to Portnoy's comments:
Login to view embedded media Gillie (Mr. "All Lives Matter") Da Coon did NOT want to address what Dave Portnoy said about Angel Reese, and went out of his way to scream "we love you, Dave" during the video clip shown above.

Trump indictment live updates: Trump pleads not guilty to 34 felony counts

Y'all thought Trump was a gangster but Biden proves more and more that he's the biggest gangster of them all. Joe is doing Trump like they did Kellz, Cosby and Al Capone. He'll be damned if Trump runs again. Here comes 4 more years of Jim Crow Joe!

But this guy can SANG! Durand Bernarr has a great voice & he's an old-school bandleader, too!
Login to view embedded media

You can expect to see more of this.

Trump lost in 2020 before the attempted January 6 election subversion. He lost before being indicted. These are generally considered the worst this he did.

According to polls:

60% of the general public approve of his indictment.

It is safe to assume that those that approved of the indictment likely won't vote for him.

This doesn't include people that disapprove but still wouldn't vote for him.

--------------------

What's really needed and decides most elections are independents

62% of independents approve of his indictment.


Again though, this doesn't include those that disapprove but still wouldn't vote for him.

--------------

Even amongst Republican voters

Only 79% disapprove of his indictment.

That means around 1 out of every 5 Republicans approve of him being indicted. These likely may not vote for him.

It is highly unlikely that a person who didn't have the general support of the public and went on to do more bad things and now doesn't have a backing of the majority of the general public, doesn't have a majority of the independent vote, and doesn't even have full support of his own party will win reelection.



The news just reports as if he has a chance because they know a portion of people and certain demographics fear and are terrified of a Trump reelection so it gets ratings.

You just can't make this up. While talking that unified mess, these hateful human beings continue to widen the divide amongst us with the stunts they pull! Jill Biden has officially chosen whose side she is on and it's definitely not ours!

Dr Amos Wilson's profound words ring true -their laws are simply hollow if they are not willing to enforce them! They only do this shit to black men so he must be black. Never consequences for corrupt members of the judiciary robbing innocent people of their liberty to life
.

Sister Reese was on point! ✊🏿💯 Congratulations 🎊 Champ!!

Login to view embedded media Come on out to the livest Foundational Black Function in LA, family!

These race judges need to be recalled!

Login to view embedded media
For all of those who believe that racism against black people doesn't exist anymore, allow Dawn Staley to explain! The media is there main proponent behind it but the media is only as racist as the people in the media!

It's cool when they do it, but it's a problem when I do it....

Caitlin took it on the chin and was in competition. I'm not sure if there were racial undertones because you never know what's said in a dorm room or locker room with others that have the same complexion. But on the surface it seemed like competitive banter.

The main issue was the punk ass racist ass media. The media made it racist! Angel Reese, just like Dawn Staley, heard the words monkey, thug and animals by the racist media and fans and stood on they square! Hell she even had coonin' A Smith sounding like the New Black Media!

Anyone remember how earlier this year the ESPN execs also told the ESPN staff to not report on Dana White's domestic abuse against his wife that he regularly cheats on?


Well now CBS is telling their staff to not report the fact that it was a transgender man (born a female) that murdered innocent schoolchildren and school staff.




Wow, not the racist white liberal media outlets conveniently "misgendering" transpeople in order to coddle an evil trans murderer and to maintain their crooked media narratives.

Not them "deadnaming" Audrey "Aiden" Hale and using "she/her/hers" pronouns instead of "he/him/his" pronouns in order to basically promote this message:

"She's female. She's not a transman, okay? Stop persecuting and committing violence against the trans community by making us hold this L. She's not ours, she's yours. Not all men are like this. Women hurt people too. She's not a man because that doesn't fit our narrative. Female shooters has increased because of her and because women bad, not because the testosterone hormones she was taking. THE TRANS COMMUNITY IS UNDER ATTACK RIGHT NOW. TRANSPEOPLE ARE CHOSEN ONES AND THE SOUL OF THIS NATION. All women and TERFs must be accountable. Sorry ladies, hold this L. After all, you all wanted us to acknowledge people's biology and real sex/gender, right? 👀 "

If the shooter was Black, the media would immediately reveal the identity of the shooter and paint the shooter as an unruly thug, a ruthless criminal, a horrible person or parent, a barbaric animal, a hatemonger, an irredeemable superpredator, and a crazy generate that everyone is scared of. (They do this all the time even when Black people are victimized. They even crucified the parents of that Black child who Harambe was carrying around. They recently did this with that Black murderer Darrell Brooks who ran over and killed people with his car at a parade.)

If the shooter was Muslim, the media would reveal the identity of the shooter and automatically claim that the shooter was a domestic / intertnational terrorist with ties to ISIS and some other radical Islamic extremist groups.

Apparently nowadays if any shooter or suspect is Asian, white (including Jewish), and/or LGBT, then they receive protection as their identities and stories are often handled with great care.

Login to view embedded media
This is a nursing channel that I follow. He does other commentary from time to time. I thought this was interesting and I absolutely agree with him!

First I'd like to preface this by saying I am a military veteran. I have graduated from two federal law enforcement academies that requires qualifying on multiple types of weapons. I am also a lifelong hunter and outdoorsman. So I am fairly familiar with guns.

This opinion may be controversial and maybe I'm wrong:

When people say assault rifle ban the idea that comes up is the military style weapon that has the tactical look.
I don't think an assault rifle ban is the overall answer. Will it help? Sure it will. Will it stop mass shootings? No.

People choose these for 3 reasons. One is they are much easier to learn to shoot and even if you have never shot one before at close range you can still be very accurate. The second reason is that they are very lethal and cause a lot of damage. The third reason is because they are so readily available.

All an assault rifle is is a semiautomatic weapon. That means that each time you pull the trigger a shot is fired. This is different than a pump action shotgun or a bolt action or lever action rifle int that you don't need to cock it, re chamber or anything in between, just pull the trigger again. There are many hunting rifles that don't have that tactical look that fit this description and if you showed it to news pundits they wouldn't even think it is an assault rifle but it functions the exact same.

So let's just say we ban all semiautomatic high powered rifles. ( that will never happen but just in theory) People that want to carry out these killings will just go to what is next available. Semiautomatic pistols or shotguns.

Now in the case of the pistols the shootings will be less deadly.
Here's why. Rifles give a lot of room for error, especially close range. You don't need site picture, your breathing can be off, your aim can be off slightly and you'll likely still hit your target. You don't need many fundamentals to be accurate with a rifle at close to moderate range. A pistol on the other hand you need some fundamentals or you'll miss even at a relatively close range. That is because pistols are more difficult to shoot accurately without lots of practice.

I'll put it this way. There are 3 qualification levels in the Army. Marksman, Sharpshooter, Expert. It took me less than a year of practice to get to Expert with an M-16A2 rifle. On the other hand it took me almost 3 years in before I finally shot Expert on a Beretta 9mm.

So with semiautomatic pistols the gunman may miss more and the pistols aren't near as lethal so dependent upon where you are hit you may survive.

But let's not forget Virginia Tech. That gunmen did a lot of damage with 2 handguns. So at close range they can still do lots of damage.

So if we ban assault rifles gunmen are just going to go to what is next readily available semiauto handguns which can fire up to 17 or more shots even with the regular magazine.

So unless we are talking about banning all semiautomatic weapons we're back to square one.

_______________________
I think regulating weapons the same way we do cars if a better option. Anyone can purchase a gun. Each year though you a to register and pay registration fees to own the weapon and you have to attest that yourself or no one in your household has mental health issues. In order to register the person should have to bring in a physician statement showing they have clear mental health. Everyone should be seeing their primary care at least once per year so this could be done at that visit.

Physicians should be released from any criminal or civil liability. This will enhance physicians facilitating these exams without fear of being sued or held criminally liable. However, if anyone in your household carries out a massacre with your weapon not only should they face criminal penalties but the owner of the weapon should also.

The fees should be charged for each weapon. Semiautomatic weapons should carry a substantially larger fee.

If anyone in the household has mental health issues then the person should be required to purchase and register a firearm safe and keep all weapons in it. This should also have a very large registration fee.

This wouldn't stop anyone from purchasing and owing a firearm. It just puts safeguards and roadblocks in the way. And at the end of the day that is all we are asking for!

Login to view embedded media