B1 rebel 365
Master Sixer
An interesting read but some of us instinctively know the answer irrespective of the opinions of a panel of justices struggling to decide on a catch all precedent commensurate with this pernicious vice, 'internet of things', that modern day society is so reliant upon.
Jason Black recently brought this subject matter up in one of his broadcasts and was forthright in his opinion that there's is no unique rudimental methodology that can make algorithms neutral/unbiased because essentially humans create the formulas for human input.
This is about website owners monopolising agenda biases they want to push but not wanting accountability/liability for potential third party content fallout.
Would like to read your perspective on it 👍🏿
qz.com
Jason Black recently brought this subject matter up in one of his broadcasts and was forthright in his opinion that there's is no unique rudimental methodology that can make algorithms neutral/unbiased because essentially humans create the formulas for human input.
This is about website owners monopolising agenda biases they want to push but not wanting accountability/liability for potential third party content fallout.
Would like to read your perspective on it 👍🏿
Why the US Supreme Court is struggling with a case about YouTube's algorithms
In Gonzalez v. Google, the Supreme Court justices struggled with questions of algorithmic neutrality—because it doesn't really exist
qz.com 
