I do not believe there is any difference between social and natural. We are natural beings living in a natural world. The things we do (societies) come from our nature. We built them in nature using nature. I think it's literally impossible for us to do anything unnatural. It's a word that has no meaning in reality because "unnatural" doesn't exist. But I digress LOL.
I don't think we would be talking about "independent women" if we were not in a highly evolved society, but we are. Why must we live like we aren't. This is actually my point. It is human to adapt. I think we open ourselves up to easy gender-based destabilization because we are unwilling to adapt. We're holding our existence hostage to our idea of a time that doesn't exist.
You have different tools for different jobs. Our bodies are just tools.
I think there isn't a single "natural order". That's just an idea. We think just because it "worked", that's the only way it can work at all times regardless of circumstance but that conclusion is completely uninvestigated. In fact, we bitterly refuse to investigate it (solely to spite the opposition largely, I believe).
I think it's an invitation for BM to evolve, to be more for BW than the traditional hunter/gatherer. How can society convince them and don't need men if they are in fact, indispensable? I'm not saying anything has to be completely abandoned but rather, expanded, improvised. I think the allowance, the freedom to not be "as it should be" and just "be", would heal any divide.
