- Messages
- 1,011
- Reputation
- 1,371
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- zBucks
- 9,261
- Sex
- Male
- Race
- Black
- Origin
- USA
So I agree with both. Both are right and both are wrong.
Anna is right in that you can't get people on your side if you attack them with personal insults. However she is wrong on that just the elite and those at the top are responsible and that the voters were tricked and hold no responsibility for their views.
Cenk is right in that we should call out and hold individual voters accountable for their racist, bigoted and biased views and only bruh concerned about culture war issues. Yes they are misinformed but it's their fault for not researching and getting complete information. We live in an age where any information you want is at your finger tips. Falling victim to propaganda if not a viable excuse.
However he is wrong in using personal insults and nsme calling to call them out. You won't get through like that because they'll immediately go on the defensive. You have to try to meet them where they are at and explain why they are wrong.
h
The point of an argument isn't to win but to convince the other party you have a rational and reasonable argument.
Who do you agree with? Cenk or Ana