I thought the wording here was a pretty sick joke.
It's such misdirection. It should read more like: "Should justice exist in America despite that meaning FBA's receive Reparations?"
Then "SOCIAL justice?" That inherently includes economic justice, but they like to keep us thinking about economics and "identity politics" separately as if they are not inextricably intertwined.
I suppose I did not expect too much from the conversation (it was hosted by USA Today) but it was actually better than I thought (don't read too much into that, it was still pretty horrible in my opinion).
Do you see Reparations to FBA as a justice for us issue or a justices for all issue?