***This is not a Christianity bashing thread.***
The Question:
How can Christians claim their doctrine to be undisputed fact if they have been unable to reach a consensus as a religion?
Christianity is the pre-eminent Abrahamic Faith in the Western World and its adherents promote it as the undisputed word of the one and only creator of the universe. If we accept this at face value, why is there so much dissension within their ranks?
We'll address 4 of the 6 major denominations:
Catholicism
Thought of Protestants as heretics and murdered them.
Deemed the Pope to be the closest man to God. Believe Jesus is one man of two natures, human nature and divine nature.
Believe you pray through the Virgin Mary and the Saints.
Protestantism
Felt the Catholic Church was corrupt and that the Pope was was the anti-christ.
Don't believe in praying through Virgin Mary or the Saints.
Eastern Orthodoxy (Orthodox Catholic Church)
Second largest Christian Church and is in line with Catholicism except it does not recognize the Pope.
Oriental Orthodoxy
Typical only agree with the first 3 ecumenical councils.
This is the form of Christianity sprouting from Ethiopia and they reject the Council of Chalcedon.
The Question:
How can Christians claim their doctrine to be undisputed fact if they have been unable to reach a consensus as a religion?
Christianity is the pre-eminent Abrahamic Faith in the Western World and its adherents promote it as the undisputed word of the one and only creator of the universe. If we accept this at face value, why is there so much dissension within their ranks?
We'll address 4 of the 6 major denominations:
Catholicism
Thought of Protestants as heretics and murdered them.
Deemed the Pope to be the closest man to God. Believe Jesus is one man of two natures, human nature and divine nature.
Believe you pray through the Virgin Mary and the Saints.
Protestantism
Felt the Catholic Church was corrupt and that the Pope was was the anti-christ.
Don't believe in praying through Virgin Mary or the Saints.
Eastern Orthodoxy (Orthodox Catholic Church)
Second largest Christian Church and is in line with Catholicism except it does not recognize the Pope.
Oriental Orthodoxy
Typical only agree with the first 3 ecumenical councils.
This is the form of Christianity sprouting from Ethiopia and they reject the Council of Chalcedon.
Each of these major denominations disagree with one another. In addition, each of these have subdivisions within each as they disagree with one another. You have Chalcedonian and Non-Chalcedonian denominations, Trinitarian and Non-Trinitarian, and etc. Christianity doesn't even have its story straight so how can you proselytize a truth that is not unified?
We can easily look at the Ecumenical Councils to see how the story was shaped by the will of man. Here are two pivotal ecumenical councils
First Council of Nicaea (Emperor Constantine I)
Established that Jesus Christ was God with the Father. Single Nature.
This was to combat Arius and his teachings that Jesus merely a created. Arius was exiled after.
Council of Chalcedon (Emperor Marcian)
Established that Jesus Christ was one man of two natures. Two Natures.
This caused the Oriental Orthodoxy split.
Everyone that disagreed with the canon was exiled or killed so how can you be sure this was the truth? The Emperors convoked these for political reasons. Is it not concerning that Romans got together to determine what was and was not apart of the religion you follow? Wouldn't these councils be man changing God's word? If the Romans couldn't agree and no one else can agree then how effective is it?
If a remote is the color red, it is a fact. I cannot interpret it as any color other than red and be factual. So if the Bible is fact why do all these churches disagree on it? Not only do Protestants disagree with Catholics, they even disagree with each other which is why you have Lutherans, Anglicans, Baptists, Pentacostals, Adventists, etc.
If you're Black American and read the King James Bible you're reading a book that int through the following?
Established that Jesus Christ was God with the Father. Single Nature.
This was to combat Arius and his teachings that Jesus merely a created. Arius was exiled after.
Council of Chalcedon (Emperor Marcian)
Established that Jesus Christ was one man of two natures. Two Natures.
This caused the Oriental Orthodoxy split.
Everyone that disagreed with the canon was exiled or killed so how can you be sure this was the truth? The Emperors convoked these for political reasons. Is it not concerning that Romans got together to determine what was and was not apart of the religion you follow? Wouldn't these councils be man changing God's word? If the Romans couldn't agree and no one else can agree then how effective is it?
If a remote is the color red, it is a fact. I cannot interpret it as any color other than red and be factual. So if the Bible is fact why do all these churches disagree on it? Not only do Protestants disagree with Catholics, they even disagree with each other which is why you have Lutherans, Anglicans, Baptists, Pentacostals, Adventists, etc.
If you're Black American and read the King James Bible you're reading a book that int through the following?
African Religion > Greek Interpretations > Adopted by Constantine in Rome/Changed through the ecumenical council > Changed by Germans Protestant Reformation (Removed 7 Books) > King James Bible (Not translated based on original texts).
So please answer in real world English not parables, if you can't even agree internally, why do you think it's fact?
If faith is the reason please just say so.
If faith is the reason please just say so.