Search results

I would not doubt it is extremely easy. We all believe our limited perspectives are the full story, that what we see is actually what's happening. We underestimate how easily we are fooled by our eyes. We see what we want to see then willingly mistake that for reality. Is there not a section of...

usher laughThat's interesting.

You believe I am defending against that? You believe I am saying your kids should be spoken to about sex in the classroom? If so, what was said to make you believe that? This is blatantly false and easily proven so, but I understand it is not meant to be an accurate statement. It is an...

It's just a feeling. Nowhere in this conversation have I denied the existence of "groomers and sickos" but it feels like I have to you, doesn't it? To the other side, it feels like heterosexuals think ALL of the LGBT community is "groomers and sickos". It is apparent that heterosexuals do not...

It's a prejudgment because you apply your past experience to the collective in the industries, coloring your vision of future experience. No matter how widespread your experience seemed, it is extremely limited. Not invalid, limited. I do not discount the possibility (or even pervasiveness) of...

I promise you I do not mean to discount your experience, but the most substantial thing you said was about "the wall of girls." Without knowing the context, that does sound suspect. But the other stuff is highly subjective. You say they are coming for our kids because teachers are hanging up...

I highly doubt many teachers are trying to talk to young kids about sex. No one has experienced this. Neither kids, school or sex are new things. Either it's always been happening or it's not happening now. And I haven't seen any statistics saying it's always been happening.

Granted. It adds that the same "instruction" will only be "constrained" in all grades which also means whatever they want, whenever they want. And what constitutes "instruction?" The word has more than one meaning in the dictionary. Can instruction encompass acknowledging something that's right...

"Age appropriate", "Developmentally appropriate" is total trick bag language. It doesn't mean anything except what you want it to mean when you want it to mean that. It isn't like they pay attention to psychology or else most of the people in jail right now, wouldn't be in jail, we would never...

Oh but when I say it… LOL

You believe that people not having self-esteem and self-worth isn't an error? Do you believe white supremacy can exist if black people were solid on those things?

The context of reality is if someone is a global slave, everyone is a global slave. Everybody's in the same boat, they just don't know it because bondage takes different forms. Everyone advocates for self because they don't recognize if you are not in bondage, you don't actually have to do that...

I bring them up because I believe it is advantageous for us to view ourselves within the context of reality. I believe a 5 year old can understand oneness fairly easily. They're actually closer to it than we are. As we grow older, we become more and more convinced of the illusion of separation.

That's not an applicable analogy. Maybe I wasn't clear, let me rephrase. Pro-blackness means self-love to me. A black, white, Asian, Indian person that is pro-black is practicing self-love. Pro-blackness is recognizing the error known as white supremacy is causing all the other errors in...

The question was "what does Pro black mean to you?" I went on to answer that question starting with the very 1st sentence. The "rant" is totally irrelevant to you because being pro-black means different things to us.

I'm just acknowledging that nothing happens in a vacuum. By helping ourselves, we're going to help other groups whether we like it or not.

Being that all is one, pro blackness is a state of loving yourself whether you are black, white, Asian, Indian, etc. It is the (conscious or unconscious) recognition that this flaw of society (white supremacy) is causing all the other flaws and uses its opposite to remedy it. The fact is...

Yes, it's a structural comparison that doesn't really have anything to do with race. Structure: Dominant group Vs. Subordinate group Context: Male vs. Female was the context of the article. Content: Whatever things the writer says black women suffered. Across all racial groups, the male is...

Structure vs. Content ex. glass of water. The glass is the structure and the water is the content. Structurally, this conversation is like white people speaking on black people integrating into their schools.

"And if biology doesn't allow for the creation of gays, let alone the influx of gays, then what does?" It's a good question. Reality (biology) does not allow for something to exist yet it does. To square this circle we would either have to believe we don't actually know everything that reality...