Search results

How is it not solved? It takes both parties to exist. If one party doesn't participate, there is no problem.

Exactly right. You don't seem confused about it at all. Everyone is arguing about nothing so there is no reason to take offense to anything. The tension needs both sides to exist. Whatever they say, however they feel, can simply be overlooked. Let them know, what they are thinking is incorrect...

"Gibberish" Exactly my point.

Shortcuts, the human mind is obsessed with using shortcuts for everything. Basically, every word we use is a shortcut. "Tree" is a shortcut. "Dog" is a shortcut. "Airplane" is a shortcut. Shortcuts are practical and helpful and whatnot but our brains don't know when to quit. When the FBA speaks...

There is some validity to their motto. You paint it in a negative light and of course, it could be taken into a negative direction but it's unlikely that one could build an army to genocide entire races of people because those people won't do what they want to do. Christians and Satanists are...

Doing the 365 daily lessons in A Course in Miracles has not only kept my peace, it's grown it. I also meditate and contemplate oneness.

I was so confused. I was like, he's light-skinned with a little yellow tent. what the hell disgustedbmThis nigga trying to gaslight me or what

I literally had no ideabglaughing2

Okay, I got it. The friend zoned and FWB can both be unrequited love because neither has the prospect for a future romance, but the friend zoned is without sex. I think the "unrequited love" part of the conversation was tripping me up because friendship plus sex equals FWB and not necessarily...

In this scenario, the woman couldn't elect to have sex with him without wanting a relationship. Isn't he still in the friend zone? Maybe the friend zone is not a one to one translation from heterosexual to homosexual as far as what qualifies. Because to add a little more context to my 1st post...

Would you agree the friend zone is more abstract than the absence of sex? I think it has more to do with attitude and exclusivity.

This confuses me because love isn't synonymous with sex. But if I consider the element of being attracted to women, who need to have at least the prospect of love to have sex (generalization), I can see why heterosexual men, who otherwise would not subscribe to this thinking, would also merge...

FWB's don't count? So the friend zone isn't as much about being stuck as friends as it is about being restricted from sex? That's interesting, I didn't know that. Now that it's reframed a bit, I do remember a guy I had met with whom we soon after began working up to a relationship for about a...

I think there's always been a part of me that was afraid or didn't think I deserved love so I pretty much have always been in the friend zone. My limiting belief makes me attracted to straight dudes most of the time. Proof, the universe doesn't bring you what you want/don't want but rather what...

usher laugh I wasn't too familiar so I googled that phrase and found an old song. The irony in it is the 2nd part of the phrase proves they have no idea what the 1st part even means. Translated, it says, "praise the Lord and let's prepare to defend against/kill it so we keep the freedom it gave...

Lamont Thanks for the engaging conversation.

I'm not suggesting an outside force (since man is part of the universe and the universe is the only thing there is, there is no outside force) but rather acknowledging what the men did isn't the only thing that contributed to the toppling of those empires. It's rather just the story we wish to...

No offense taken. I likely don't speak of anything "supernatural." To label something supernatural means that I know everything that is natural and no one on earth has that knowledge. Another difference between me and the "fossils" might be the awareness of the progression of consciousness...

I respect that and I definitely agree with some of your points. In my spiritual/self studies, I learned that the universe is not necessarily a free for all. I mean it is but it ain't. There are laws that cannot be broken. If you go against them, you mark yourself for suffering and eventual...

You believe there is a possibility their rule could be permanent if we don't fight it? If we had to fight it in order for it to die, could we possibly kill something that has been in power since 300 A.D.?