This is an agenda to me. It almost sounds like a prepared sermon.
You are correct about that.
I do have an agenda though probably not the one you think. It isn't malicious.
What I have learned through my spiritual journey over the years (which includes but not limited to observation, contemplation, meditation, self inquiry) is the human mind is not as simple as we tend to think. One plus one doesn't necessarily equal two for a variety of reasons.
One reason could be that the variable of "one" could be an assumption that we haven't questioned deep enough and is actually something totally different than we thought. So we are solving 1+1 but were actually dealing with 2's we have assumed were 1's. Not only that, the human brain isn't as rigid as math so the idea of the equation itself being valid is a figment of our imaginations.
Take the gay agenda: we might say it makes men more feminine by showing children men in dresses. But what is "more feminine"? By what standard? How is it measured and who holds the definitive measuring stick? Even if we knew that, how do we know men in dresses shown to children causes it? How do we know it doesn't do the opposite? If we knew that, how do we know it's permanent or temporary? If we knew that, how do we know it matters beyond assumptions formed by conditioning?
On top of that, what is the belief in it doing to the person that believes in it? How do we know a person isn't unconsciously being inauthentically masculine as a response to it? What effects would that have? That's just one possibility. If you judge someone, you judge yourself at the same time so who knows what effects that will have over time.
Then, we have to put all that into the context of an ever-changing reality ("outside world") were we cannot know what will be in the future, nor how it will influence a person.
The idea of the gay agenda being a threat is a labyrinth we are imposing one + one on to. It's a fantasy that I think only has a negative impact on the people thinking it's a threat, but I don't actually know that because it would be imposing one+one onto reality. I literally cannot criticize people for believing in it without doing the very thing for which I'm criticizing them, LOL. My post is literally a paradox.
It sounds like a prepared sermon probably because I am a writer who goes through drafts on my posts.