News

[Rollie Forbes]

The ruling came in this morning, 6-3

More to come.

This ruling has huge implications, including the ability to refuse services to interracial couples, certain races, etc..

The Supreme Court rules for a designer who doesn't want to make wedding websites for gay couples

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has ruled a Christian graphic artist who wants to design wedding websites can refuse to work with same-sex couples. The decision is a defeat for gay rights.

apnews.com

 

[Deleted member 191]

This might sound odd....but honestly.....I blame the TQ pluses for this one.....People had their hang ups with the gays but for the most part....no one gave a shit for real.


These Ts and Qs and pluses came in with their pedo-justifying bullshit and people have had it.

 

[Rollie Forbes]

This might sound odd....but honestly.....I blame the TQ pluses for this one.....People had their hang ups with the gays but for the most part....no one gave a shit for real.


These Ts and Qs and pluses came in with their pedo-justifying bullshit and people have had it.

Very good point. At this point, even the LGBs are sick of the Ts & Qs.

Spoiler

 

[The Honorable]

This might sound odd....but honestly.....I blame the TQ pluses for this one.....People had their hang ups with the gays but for the most part....no one gave a shit for real.


These Ts and Qs and pluses came in with their pedo-justifying bullshit and people have had it.

Well there were still laws impacting the LGBT community historically but to your point I believe that the radical fringe of their movement have made moderates become opponents. There is a new term they have concocted called “neopronouns” which allows them to go by zie/zer it is absolutely ridiculous.

 

[Kanu]

People should have the right to deny service to whomever if that's how they feel like. Nobody should be forced to bow down to the lgbt/liberal agenda.

"The decision suggests that artists, photographers, videographers and writers are among those who can refuse to offer what the court called expressive services if doing so would run contrary to their beliefs. But that’s different from other businesses not engaged in speech and therefore not covered by the First Amendment, such as restaurants and hotels."

 

[Harbinger]

People should have the right to deny service to whomever if that's how they feel like. Nobody should be forced to bow down to the lgbt/liberal agenda.

"The decision suggests that artists, photographers, videographers and writers are among those who can refuse to offer what the court called expressive services if doing so would run contrary to their beliefs. But that’s different from other businesses not engaged in speech and therefore not covered by the First Amendment, such as restaurants and hotels."

The issue is that it is slippery slope and the denial of service can easily be due to ethnic or racial differences.

 

[TekhNiqo]

I’m good with it honestly although I understand the implications. I don’t think that anyone should be forced to promote something they don’t agree with and the decision in the other direction could set an even worse precedent. I’ll go ahead and say what some people won’t…the LGBT community can be pushy and entitled as FUCK. I’m from the bay and I see that shit all the time. I know it isn’t all of them but I have never seen a group behave as if the world owes them something. In so many ways I feel like LGBT has become the new white privilege because it’s like the world has to stop and conform to gay white men or white transgender women. I just saw a video the other day with some transgender mad that an Gynecologist wouldnt see them…

As far as possible racial discrimination I doubt it would have changed anything for us either way. They have plenty of ways to obscure racial discrimination. To be completely honest I would almost like to see that in some capacity because at least we would a) be incentivized to buy from our own b) reveal who the enemies are so we can do business with people who want our business. If they hate us enough not to want our money that sounds like a personal problem