The Cookout

[Czharcus]

… it evolves into an island of heterosexuals and some homosexuals just like everywhere else.

I guess sometimes I feel like the fear/concern/talk/rhetoric/whatever over LGBT/gay agenda gets out of hand. It's arrogant to think that we or anyone else can manipulate a population into nonexistence via LGBT. If such a thing did happen, it would literally be an act of God.We did not create the rules of the universe, nor can we change them. LGBT does not mean sterile.

I think it stems from the idea that the homosexual is not a natural phenomenon. And from there, people imagine all types of impossible things can happen.

The creator made EVERYTHING that's here for a reason. That reason is not to work ourselves into a frenzy over it because we don't know the reason. The creator did not make mistake with LGBT. They are not doing something He did not plan for them to do. He is not angered or surprised by them. No one has hijacked His Plan.

We have fabricated a 100% non-threat and made it real in our heads, so we see the evidence of our fabrication because that's what we want to see.

Your thoughts…

 

[Jay]

This is why you’re wrong:

Look at this disgusting anti-Black male scene:


View: https://twitter.com/MBEmpower/status/1467216550067273729


Black men do not talk like this in Barbershops, I’ve never ever heard this vile language in my life. But when the Producer was getting checked on it what was her response?



So she produces a Anti-Black male scene written by Queer Black people, this is not an issue in our head @Czharcus it’s real. White liberals fund LGBT groups to cause in-fighting in the Black community. These people that wrote this scene are clearly not Black first and that’s a problem for all Black people.

You should be separating yourself from these groups not defending them.

 

[Czharcus]

This is why you’re wrong:

Look at this disgusting anti-Black male scene:


View: https://twitter.com/MBEmpower/status/1467216550067273729


Black men do not talk like this in Barbershops, I’ve never ever heard this vile language in my life. But when the Producer was getting checked on it what was her response?

View attachment 989

So she produces a Anti-Black male scene written by Queer Black people, this is not an issue in our head @Czharcus it’s real. White liberals fund LGBT groups to cause in-fighting in the Black community. These people that wrote this scene are clearly not Black first and that’s a problem for all Black people.

You should be separating yourself from these groups not defending them.

Black people are the only group I am defending with my statements. We're getting worked up over nothing. The part we are making up is the part where it matters. What is actually lost due to this scene?

 

[Rex Lawrence]

… it evolves into an island of heterosexuals and some homosexuals just like everywhere else.

I guess sometimes I feel like the fear/concern/talk/rhetoric/whatever over LGBT/gay agenda gets out of hand. It's arrogant to think that we or anyone else can manipulate a population into nonexistence via LGBT. If such a thing did happen, it would literally be an act of God.We did not create the rules of the universe, nor can we change them. LGBT does not mean sterile.

I think it stems from the idea that the homosexual is not a natural phenomenon. And from there, people imagine all types of impossible things can happen.

The creator made EVERYTHING that's here for a reason. That reason is not to work ourselves into a frenzy over it because we don't know the reason. The creator did not make mistake with LGBT. They are not doing something He did not plan for them to do. He is not angered or surprised by them. No one has hijacked His Plan.

We have fabricated a 100% non-threat and made it real in our heads, so we see the evidence of our fabrication because that's what we want to see.

Your thoughts…

But the practice of homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. 1 Corinthians 6:9, Romans 1:24-29

 

[Czharcus]

But the practice of homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. 1 Corinthians 6:9, Romans 1:24-29

The spiritual core of the Bible is authentic. But it has passed through many powerful hands that manipulated or misinterpreted it for the purposes of control.

Why would the Creator condemn his creation?

 

[Jay]

Black people are the only group I am defending with my statements. We're getting worked up over nothing. The part we are making up is the part where it matters. What is actually lost due to this scene?

It perpetuates the “Black brute myth” and presents us as nasty, classless, degenerate, sex crazed, anti-gay animals which is a stereotype created by whites and propagated in this scene by Black people. If you’re Black and not concerned with Black people are viewed in the media, you are not Black first. The people that wrote that scene are enemies to Black society.

 

[Rex Lawrence]

The spiritual core of the Bible is authentic. But it has passed through many powerful hands that manipulated or misinterpreted it for the purposes of control.

Why would the Creator condemn his creation?

I hope you don't claim that people are born or created homosexual. There is no homosexual gene.

Yes, the Bible has been misinterpreted. The Nicean Councils during the fourth century, specifically added pagan ideas and folklore to what they termed "Christianity". This was all prophesized in the parable of the wheat and tares.

Also, since the Bible is the word of God, wouldn't he be able to ensure that it's message was preserved? If you just read it the messages are still intact.

Finally, the scribes who transcribed the Bible use to count every letter to make sure there were no changes.

 

[Boss Hog]

Black people are the only group I am defending with my statements. We're getting worked up over nothing. The part we are making up is the part where it matters. What is actually lost due to this scene?

We’re telling you that it matters and you tell us that we’re wrong. You are coming off a LGBT 1st and not B1, my two cents.

 

[Blackqueen64]

… it evolves into an island of heterosexuals and some homosexuals just like everywhere else.

I guess sometimes I feel like the fear/concern/talk/rhetoric/whatever over LGBT/gay agenda gets out of hand. It's arrogant to think that we or anyone else can manipulate a population into nonexistence via LGBT. If such a thing did happen, it would literally be an act of God.We did not create the rules of the universe, nor can we change them. LGBT does not mean sterile.

I think it stems from the idea that the homosexual is not a natural phenomenon. And from there, people imagine all types of impossible things can happen.

The creator made EVERYTHING that's here for a reason. That reason is not to work ourselves into a frenzy over it because we don't know the reason. The creator did not make mistake with LGBT. They are not doing something He did not plan for them to do. He is not angered or surprised by them. No one has hijacked His Plan.

We have fabricated a 100% non-threat and made it real in our heads, so we see the evidence of our fabrication because that's what we want to see.

Your thoughts…

Homosexuality is not new neither is it a sign of being progressive, actually it is a sign of regression. The Creeks and Romans elite engaged in it with Pubescent boys, for they stated that there was not higher form of love then that with their pubescent boy lovers. They believed that the woman was only necessary for procreation purposes.

The creator put in motion the ability of humans, animals, insects, fish, birds to recreate themselves. I have yet to see with the exception of the human for the mate to be the same sex. A lion will never try to mate with another male lion in the wild, because that will not farther its species of the big cats.

I believe that the creator knew the future and that it would come a time when human being would want to love and mate with the same sex, I don't believe that the creator lacked insightfulness and did not understand the notion of recreating oneself. I think it was possible for the creator to create a human with both working and functional sexual organs to be able to mate and procreate whether they are male or female. It seems to me it would speaks volumes to the lack of the all-knowing that we associate with being the creator.

I don't think that it was the creator that makes a person to desire small children in a sexual way, even though they love the children in other ways as well. I don't believe that the creator makes a person to have a sexual desire for their animals that they love. We know that people love their dogs and cats so much that they will pay for medical insurance for them and will even leave them money in their will for their animal to be take care of for the rest of its life.

I have a scenario for you. We have these five couples and all of them are young and healthy in every way, they are all stranded on five different Islands with no way to get off. the couples are as follows
couple #1 is a biological heterosexual male and female
couple #2 is 2 gay women
couple #3 is 2 gay men
couple #4 is a transman with a biological heterosexual woman
couple #5 is a transwoman with a biological heterosexual man
Tell me which couple would be able to create a family to populate their perspective Island.

 

[Czharcus]

It perpetuates the “Black brute myth” and presents us as nasty, classless, degenerate, sex crazed, anti-gay animals which is a stereotype created by whites and propagated in this scene by Black people. If you’re Black and not concerned with Black people are viewed in the media, you are not Black first. The people that wrote that scene are enemies to Black society.

Everything only has the meaning we give it. If people give the kind of real life meaning to scenes like this, we can't really do anything about that. Truth wins in the end anyway.

Artists show us what's in their consciousness. The dominant society will choose to elevate how they want to see us. That's just what it is. We don't actually need to fight it, just create our own images and the truth in them will outshine things like this.

 

[Blackqueen64]

The spiritual core of the Bible is authentic. But it has passed through many powerful hands that manipulated or misinterpreted it for the purposes of control.

Why would the Creator condemn his creation?

The same reason that you would condemn your child if it is doing wrong.

 

[Jay]

Everything only has the meaning we give it. If people give the kind of real life meaning to scenes like this, we can't really do anything about that. Truth wins in the end anyway.

Artists show us what's in their consciousness. The dominant society will choose to elevate how they want to see us. That's just what it is. We don't actually need to fight it, just create our own images and the truth in them will outshine things like this.

Yes. We can create our own messages but we can also condemn those who speak against us as well…we can walk and chew bubblegum. If the Government is using LGBT talking points to attack the Black community we have all the right to highlight this and call out the people that work with the government against us.

 

[Czharcus]

I hope you don't claim that people are born or created homosexual. There is no homosexual gene.

I am. There is no heterosexual gene either. Yet, they both are natural phenomenon.

Also, since the Bible is the word of God, wouldn't he be able to ensure that it's message was preserved?

He would, but how do we know it is not his will to not do so?

Finally, the scribes who transcribed the Bible use to count every letter to make sure there were no changes.

That is likely true. It doesn't correct for misinterpretation.

 

[Rex Lawrence]

I am. There is no heterosexual gene either. Yet, they both are natural phenomenon.

He would, but how do we know it is not his will to not do so?

That is likely true. It doesn't correct for misinterpretation.

I learned years ago not to attempt to reason with fanatics, white racists, homosexuals or potheads. For that reason I will say, have a great day, and goodbye.

 

[Czharcus]

We’re telling you that it matters and you tell us that we’re wrong. You are coming off a LGBT 1st and not B1, my two cents.

You're right. If it matters to you, that is the suffering you have chosen for yourself, the karma your soul will work through (just like starting this conversation is part of the karma my soul is working through). It is not for me to say it is wrong. I don't think it is btw. I was hopefully only highlighting you are creating a problem that isn't actually there (just like i am).

If it means LGBT 1st vs. black 1st, that's what it means for you. I accept that I can't do anything about that.

 

[Czharcus]

Homosexuality is not new neither is it a sign of being progressive, actually it is a sign of regression. The Creeks and Romans elite engaged in it with Pubescent boys, for they stated that there was not higher form of love then that with their pubescent boy lovers. They believed that the woman was only necessary for procreation purposes.

The creator put in motion the ability of humans, animals, insects, fish, birds to recreate themselves. I have yet to see with the exception of the human for the mate to be the same sex. A lion will never try to mate with another male lion in the wild, because that will not farther its species of the big cats.

I believe that the creator knew the future and that it would come a time when human being would want to love and mate with the same sex, I don't believe that the creator lacked insightfulness and did not understand the notion of recreating oneself. I think it was possible for the creator to create a human with both working and functional sexual organs to be able to mate and procreate whether they are male or female. It seems to me it would speaks volumes to the lack of the all-knowing that we associate with being the creator.

I don't think that it was the creator that makes a person to desire small children in a sexual way, even though they love the children in other ways as well. I don't believe that the creator makes a person to have a sexual desire for their animals that they love. We know that people love their dogs and cats so much that they will pay for medical insurance for them and will even leave them money in their will for their animal to be take care of for the rest of its life.

I have a scenario for you. We have these five couples and all of them are young and healthy in every way, they are all stranded on five different Islands with no way to get off. the couples are as follows
couple #1 is a biological heterosexual male and female
couple #2 is 2 gay women
couple #3 is 2 gay men
couple #4 is a transman with a biological heterosexual woman
couple #5 is a transwoman with a biological heterosexual man
Tell me which couple would be able to create a family to populate their perspective Island.

The Creator is Its Creation.



Obviously, the couple that still has the parts to procreate will be the only ones that can procreate. It's not actually confusing to anyone. The part that people contend is the idea these hypothetical unlikely scenarios mean anything in the reality we live in today. It doesn't actually mean anything to our current circumstance that couples 2–5 can't procreate.

I can make up a scenario to where 2 people are in outerspace, 1 with a space suit and one without. It doesn't actually mean anything other than don't go into space without a space suit. Your scenarios don't actually mean anything other than, if you are 2 people stranded on an island, you won't be able to procreate unless you fit the configuration of individuals that can procreate. Any meaning beyond what is true in the specific circumstance, we're making up.

 

[Czharcus]

The same reason that you would condemn your child if it is doing wrong.

Parents generally don't condemn their children if they do something wrong. They teach them or allow them to learn on their own because that is what love does.

Parents that condemn their children are actually condemning themselves.

 

[Kanu]

The creator did not make mistake with LGBT

The Most High did not create sin, His enemy did.


Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.


Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.

 

[Czharcus]

Yes. We can create our own messages but we can also condemn those who speak against us as well…we can walk and chew bubblegum. If the Government is using LGBT talking points to attack the Black community we have all the right to highlight this and call out the people that work with the government against us.

We can condemn it if we want to, but we literally don't have to. In fact, we only empower it more when we do.

One example is I didn't even know about that movie/scene until I saw someone condemn it on Twitter. "Resistance makes stronger." We think we have to resist these images when we don't. If we did not resist it, it would have fell into obscurity without a bump. WE, our resistance IS their marketing. And so incentivizing them to do it again.


Again, I'm not condemning anyone or saying how you react is wrong. Really, there is no other way people can react than way they are reacting if they are not conscience of a way that may be preferable to them so I'm really just provoking thought, throwing a less painful idea into the mix.

 

[Boss Hog]

You're right. If it matters to you, that is the suffering you have chosen for yourself, the karma your soul will work through (just like starting this conversation is part of the karma my soul is working through). It is not for me to say it is wrong. I don't think it is btw. I was hopefully only highlighting you are creating a problem that isn't actually there (just like i am).

If it means LGBT 1st vs. black 1st, that's what it means for you. I accept that I can't do anything about that.

This is stupid bullshit.

 

[Czharcus]

The Most High did not create sin, His enemy did.

The most high does not have an enemy. It implies a struggle, that there is a will that could possibly overtake God's. Your image of the most high paints him as submitting to a higher power that decides whether he will be fortunate this day or the next.

Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.

What does that mean in context? Many believe it is literal in today's context, but is it?

Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.

What is the kingdom of God? What is righteousness? What is it about the "fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, homosexuals, sodomites, thieves, covetous, drunkards, revilers, extortioners" that does not allow them entry (within the context of the day this was written)? Who are those people in context?

 

[Lamont]

This is why you’re wrong:

Look at this disgusting anti-Black male scene:


View: https://twitter.com/MBEmpower/status/1467216550067273729


Black men do not talk like this in Barbershops, I’ve never ever heard this vile language in my life. But when the Producer was getting checked on it what was her response?

View attachment 989

So she produces a Anti-Black male scene written by Queer Black people, this is not an issue in our head @Czharcus it’s real. White liberals fund LGBT groups to cause in-fighting in the Black community. These people that wrote this scene are clearly not Black first and that’s a problem for all Black people.

You should be separating yourself from these groups not defending them.

This is a great post and illustrates the issue in its entirety. One’s sexual preference is not the issue, intersectionality is. Black LGBT intersects with White LGBT via sexual preference, this is their form of proximity to whiteness. Many see this commonality and think that it makes them different than other Blacks and allow themselves to become puppets for White interests. They deserve the same treatment we’d give any other coon or sell out, their sexual preference is irrelevant. We simply emphasize LGBT as a way to be specific about the coon we are referencing. If you have an issue with us putting the spotlight on LGBT coons then what does that make you?

 

[Jay]

This is a great post and illustrates the issue in its entirety. One’s sexual preference is not the issue, intersectionality is. Black LGBT intersects with White LGBT via sexual preference, this is their form of proximity to whiteness. Many see this commonality and think that it makes them different than other Blacks and allow themselves to become puppets for White interests. They deserve the same treatment we’d give any other coon or sell out, their sexual preference is irrelevant. We simply emphasize LGBT as a way to be specific about the coon we are referencing. If you have an issue with us putting the spotlight on LGBT coons then what does that make you?

Yeah if you trying to take our eyes off of a subset of coons then I quest what your agenda is.

 

[Czharcus]

This is stupid bullshit.

I just agreed with you but it's "stupid bullshit." It's because I pointed out something that appears objective, is actually subjective?

 

[Jay]

@Czharcus ib the Subconscious Coon Matrix we highlight a subset of individuals who work against us.



A group of people whose goal is to deflect from white supremacy by making the Black man the enemy.

We saw this take place in the video of LGBT writers showing Black men as crazy raunchy savages.

You are coming to us to defend their actions and tell us that they don’t matter.

That we should not care that they are throwing rocks at us.

You don’t condemn their actions, you condemn our reaction.

So it makes no sense for us to separate you from them.

You agree with those writers and the black brute stereotype which is why you are caping for them.

 

[Kanu]

The most high does not have an enemy. It implies a struggle, that there is a will that could possibly overtake God's. Your image of the most high paints him as submitting to a higher power that decides whether he will be fortunate this day or the next.

What does that mean in context? Many believe it is literal in today's context, but is it?

What is the kingdom of God? What is righteousness? What is it about the "fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, homosexuals, sodomites, thieves, covetous, drunkards, revilers, extortioners" that does not allow them entry (within the context of the day this was written)? Who are those people in context?

Do you classify yourself as a "Progressive Christian"?
All the questions you asked are in the bible, if you accept it or not that's on you.

​

1 John 4:1

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.

Clearly in John 4 Jesus is saying there are 2 kinds of spirits, those who worship God and those who worship His enemy.

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

People will open there minds to alternative lifestyles and aliens and ghosts but wont fathom that a society was created off of your ignorance. People will tell you exactly whats going on and show you but you still want to argue. Not with the accusers but with people that have the light of truth in them. I dont care who anyone sleeps with. You can be "gay" tonight and be well tomorrow. That is your choice. But Im black everyday.No Off days.B1

 

[Czharcus]

@Czharcus ib the Subconscious Coon Matrix we highlight a subset of individuals who work against us.

View attachment 990

A group of people whose goal is to deflect from white supremacy by making the Black man the enemy.

We saw this take place in the video of LGBT writers showing Black men as crazy raunchy savages.

You are coming to us to defend their actions and tell us that they don’t matter.

That we should not care that they are throwing rocks at us.

You don’t condemn their actions, you condemn are reaction.

So it makes no sense for us to separate you from them.

You agree with those writers and the black brute stereotype which is why you are caping for them.

There are some misconceptions towards me in here.

I do not deny some people are attempting to misdirect. In fact, I know that they are. My goal is not to condemn the people doing it, because in the end, they lose anyway. Black men cannot be "the enemy". If they were actually the "bad guys" there would not be a need to show propaganda portraying them as such. It's an illusion that some people believe, but they believe it because they want to, not because it's convincing. This type of thing doesn't actually turn anyone in either direction so nor does fighting against it.

If anything, the fighting against makes it real to you and onlookers that are "on the fence" because if it were not true, why would you be fighting it? Reality is counterintuitive a lot of the time.

"Throw a rock and a hit dog will holler ." Us not responding to them throwing rocks is evidence the rocks do not matter and cannot hurt us in so they will try different methods. If none of them work, they are completely disarmed. But if we are hollering at every rock they throw, why would they stop throwing them? Are we winning at that point?

I do not condemn people's reactions, just pointing out how they are perpetuating the problem.

I'm not caping for them, my goal is literally invincibility for us.

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

Black people are the only group I am defending with my statements. We're getting worked up over nothing. The part we are making up is the part where it matters. What is actually lost due to this scene?

I dont want my kids watching this ever. Its not creative or productive. What fuels a fight for all of this?

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

I stopped watching t.v. because I realized the t.v. shows were pre picked before they are showed on air. Someone comes up with a list of shows called programs for you to watch for whatever reason THEY feel. Thanks to the Black Media we are able to call out the BS. They been doing this forever. I just had to be REAL with myself and know im smart enough to determine the subliminals. Im getting much better.It takes time. But you gotta step AWAY from the white.

 

[Czharcus]

Do you classify yourself as a "Progressive Christian"?
All the questions you asked are in the bible, if you accept it or not that's on you.

I've never heard of a "progressive Christian."
My interpretations and your interpretations of the Bible are obviously different, so we can both accept what it says and still be in this very same predicament.


I believe the fundamental difference in our interpretations is where we place, God.

Clearly in John 4 Jesus is saying there are 2 kinds of spirits, those who worship God and those who worship His enemy.

But is our interpretation of "enemy" the same as his? The Bible is not a literal text.

 

[TheHarmattan]

I read the title and wrote this reply. I'm not giving this subject any more energy.

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

I read the title and wrote this reply. I'm not giving this subject any more energy.

I respect that. But i would like to say.There is NOWHERE I know with discussions like these. Even if it goes left its still a FAMILY discussion.I think we are all growing.

 

[Czharcus]

I dont want my kids watching this ever. Its not creative or productive. What fuels a fight for all of this?

Your kids won't be hurt by this. Whether it is creative or productive is a personal choice judgment, which you are entitled to, of course. I do not claim you should not react the way that you do, you're reacting exactly as you should because everyone is always doing their best at all times.

This conversation is not a fight in my eyes.

 

[Troy]

I read the title and wrote this reply. I'm not giving this subject any more energy.

It's a double dutch jump rope you want to hop in but you don't want to commit either.

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

Your kids won't be hurt by this. Whether it is creative or productive is a personal choice judgment, which you are entitled to, of course. I do not claim you should not react the way that you do, you're reacting exactly as you should because everyone is always doing their best at all times.

This conversation is not a fight in my eyes.

The IMAGES of slavery still has us talking about reperations.Images are everything.

 

[Nesut]

There are some misconceptions towards me in here.

I do not deny some people are attempting to misdirect. In fact, I know that they are. My goal is not to condemn the people doing it, because in the end, they lose anyway. Black men cannot be "the enemy". If they were actually the "bad guys" there would not be a need to show propaganda portraying them as such. It's an illusion that some people believe, but they believe it because they want to, not because it's convincing. This type of thing doesn't actually turn anyone in either direction so nor does fighting against it.

If anything, the fighting against makes it real to you and onlookers that are "on the fence" because if it were not true, why would you be fighting it? Reality is counterintuitive a lot of the time.

"Throw a rock and a hit dog will holler ." Us not responding to them throwing rocks is evidence the rocks do not matter and cannot hurt us in so they will try different methods. If none of them work, they are completely disarmed. But if we are hollering at every rock they throw, why would they stop throwing them? Are we winning at that point?

I do not condemn people's reactions, just pointing out how they are perpetuating the problem.

I'm not caping for them, my goal is literally invincibility for us.

History doesn't work out as you've stated. When a government wants to eradicate a population it demonizes them. You are advocating for us to put our head in the sand and hope it goes away? We should let these people put out drivel about us that informs the newer generations and not say anything? If you don't agree with us calling out the coons why does it bother you? Why don't you simply not focus on it if you don't like it? You see what Jews do when you cross them, they will take you all the way out the game. But with us we have to ignore those who attack us?

 

[Czharcus]

The IMAGES of slavery still has us talking about reperations.Images are everything.

I would argue, it is the repercussions/reverberations of slavery that has us talking about reparations. Images are nothing, how you interpret them is what matters.

Both of us could look at the exact same image and have only one of us be touched/traumatized by it.

So you could be bothered by images your children wouldn't ever be fazed by on a conscious or subconscious level. I'm not making a judgment call on what you should and should not allow your children to see, let me be clear. The fact is, we have no control over anything (nor do the people we think have control) and that includes which images do what to us. The image that you recoil from could spark greatness in your child.

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

Stop watching t.v. and get off of social media for a week.Youll see the difference.

 

[TheHarmattan]

I respect that. But i would like to say.There is NOWHERE I know with discussions like these. Even if it goes left its still a FAMILY discussion.I think we are all growing.

You might be right, but through thick and thin you must have already developed a system of values. Those values will carry you forward if they are righteous. I'm not saying that you won't suffer hardships but in the end they will serve you well.

 

[TheHarmattan]

It's a double dutch jump rope you want to hop in but you don't want to commit either.

I'm not 15 anymore. As adults, some things like this thread should have already been learned and understood by now. So, I acknowledged the subject and kept moving. I'm not angry at the thread nor the poster.

 

[Czharcus]

History doesn't work out as you've stated.

Human history was necessary but extremely dysfunctional. It's more beneficial to us to take what they did and improve on it, raise our consciousness.

When a government wants to eradicate a population it demonizes them.

Yes, what did the population being eradicated do?

You are advocating for us to put our head in the sand and hope it goes away? We should let these people put out drivel about us that informs the newer generations and not say anything?

I am advocating for a more conscious way to deal with it. Fighting it head on is obvious, a knee-jerk. It takes no thought whatsoever. So it's predictable. we are fighting something we believe is extremely sophisticated with knee-jerk reactions.

I don't mean to judge because I am also guilty.

What will be important to the new generation is not what they are doing, the images they create, it's what we are doing, the images we create. We can fight their images if we want to, but it is a waste of energy.

If you don't agree with us calling out the coons why does it bother you? Why don't you simply not focus on it if you don't like it?

You are correct, I could just ignore it, which I do most of the time. It is not even that I disagree or do not like it, I just see how it is sometimes self-defeating, causing more suffering to us then to them.

You see what Jews do when you cross them, they will take you all the way out the game. But with us we have to ignore those who attack us?

Jews have to do that because their standing is so fragile. White supremacy in general is so sensitive to challenge because it intuitively knows, a specifically placed hair would completely break its back and no one knows where the spot is. I don't believe we need to become that.

Strength is not shown in defense, it's in not having to defend at all. You can even take the fictional character of Superman as an extreme example: he doesn't show he is strong by defending against bullets. It translates.

 

[Czharcus]

As adults, some things like this thread should have already been learned and understood by now.

That's a triggering statement LOL. Not because of what it was about but the question of authority.

Who gets to make this call? Who determines what people should and should not be over and when?

This is triggering for me because I do the same thing. Sometimes, I think I should be more spiritual than I am. But in comparison to who? On who's authority am I saying that? What makes them the standardbearer for me?

 

[Bruh Man]

@Czharcus when u gon post some shit that aint got nothing to do with being gay? We dont hate gay people over here we hate coons

 

[Czharcus]

@Czharcus when u gon post some ish that aint got nothing to do with being gay? We dont hate gay people over here we hate coons

I've never claimed anyone here hates gays. Hate for the other doesn't exist, it's always actually self-hate projected outwards so it isn't recognized as what it is.

I've done so before but point taken. In any case, it's usually just a vehicle that I use to say something else. Like, this post isn't actually about gays but rather the response to them and how it actually works in opposition to the desired effect.

It just so happens I can see these things because of my proximity. As I've said before, my soul is also working through some type of karma in this area so there is a teach/learn dynamic. People as a whole, not just black people, are working through some collective karma in this area. If they were not, it literally would not garner so much attention from anyone.

On a side note, I'm reminded of people earlier in my film career saying something like "you are not always going to have gay characters in your movies are you? After they find out I'm gay". No one's ever inquired about the amount of straight characters in straight people's films. You probably never recognize there are many straight people on here, always bringing up straight stuff. It never crossed your mind to ask them when they were going to post something that had nothing to do with being straight. I'm not coming at you for this. It's the type of thing that's unconscious.

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

Ok.Ill do it. You couldnt be prepared for war if you dont know and embrace your role. I am a soldier who cant really relate to a black man who dosent want to be a man and conduct himself as one. Its hard being a MAN period but I cant cop out. I am what I was created as. And I am not a creation of another human. I am a product of sexual intercourse. You are too. Its the only way it really goes.lol

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

Ok.Ill do it. You couldnt be prepared for war if you dont know and embrace your role. I am a soldier who cant really relate to a black man who dosent want to be a man and conduct himself as one. Its hard being a MAN period but I cant cop out. I am what I was created as. And I am not a creation of another human. I am a product of sexual intercourse. You are too. Its the only way it really goes.lol

A war we were born in.Ongoing

 

[Czharcus]

I am a product of sexual intercourse. You are too. Its the only way it really goes.lol

Why do you believe anyone believes otherwise?

I am a soldier who cant really relate to a black man who dosent want to be a man and conduct himself as one. Its hard being a MAN period

I am an artist. I explore behaviors and provoke "out-of-the-box" thinking. I understand that many of us believe we have figured out reality because we have selected what we believe are facts and have taken them as truth without realizing they are without grounds.

It is the nature of the ego to grab ahold of anything and everything and claim it's definitely what we say it is, truth notwithstanding, because it gives us a sense of stability in a world of constant change. Truth is, we give everything all the meaning it holds but we don't actually have to and we would be better off if we didn't.

 

[SIXDIMENSIONS]

It is not the nature of a man to promote something he dosent condone

 

[Czharcus]

It is not the nature of a man to promote something he dosent condone

No one's asked a man to do that. (At least not here)