Goes back to my original point, men speaking in ideals instead of realities. That’s nice what men “should be” doing this and that but that’s not reality. The vast majority of women will never be with a man who doesn’t need her help paying the bills.
Why does the solution always have to be something out of reach for the vast majority of people?
Women are having less sex but the number of men is far greater . Women are having sex with the most desirable men and leaving the others out in the cold.
Well we have to factor in wage stagnation since 1978, cost of living increases, middle class erosion, and etc they all play a role in why the AVERAGE household needs dual incomes.
It's not a fair comparison to women because women don't have to hunt to have sex. A man with no money has no chance of getting sex, a broke woman can get sex whenever but what a woman can't get readily is a man to commit to her.https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/29/share-americans-not-having-sex-has-reached-record-high/
“For most of the past three decades, 20-something men and women reported similar rates of sexlessness. But that has changed in recent years. Since 2008, the share of men younger than 30 reporting no sex has nearly tripled, to 28 percent. That’s a much steeper increase than the 8 percentage point increase reported among their female peers.”
300% vs 8% 😂 This is what men are choosing?